As I sit watching Democracy Now coverage of the election, highlights of which will be enumerated below, I was just rifling through my sitemeter records. You'd be surprised how many people really end up viewing your blog, if only for 1 second on their way to finding what they're looking for, and the referrals page is always most interesting to me. I love to see how people originally stumbled upon my blog, even if they weren't looking for it. So, I check out a referral that says blogs were searched for the following key phrase: "redeployed and Iraq and mental." Hm. So, I open the link just to see. Then, I wonder the next logical question--who in the world is google blog searching such an awkward phrase?
Well, folks, have a look for yourselves:
Domain Name |
| osd.mil ? (Military) |
IP Address |
| 134.152.182.# (The Pentagon) |
ISP |
| The Pentagon |
Location |
| Continent | : | North America | Country | : | United States (Facts) | State | : | Virginia | City | : | Arlington | Lat/Long | : | 38.8782, -77.1054 (Map) | Distance | : | 156 miles |
|
Language |
| English (U.S.) en-us |
Operating System |
| Microsoft WinXP |
Browser |
| Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 |
Javascript |
| version 1.5 |
Monitor |
| Resolution | : | 1024 x 768 | Color Depth | : | 32 bits |
|
Time of Visit |
| Oct 27 2008 11:45:19 am |
Last Page View |
| Oct 27 2008 11:45:19 am |
Visit Length |
| 0 seconds |
Page Views |
| 1 |
Referring URL |
| http://blogsearch.go...al&btnG=Search Blogs |
Search Engine |
| blogsearch.google.com |
Search Words |
| redeployed and iraq and mental |
Visit Entry Page |
| http://onthelearn.bl...weekend-in-city.html |
Visit Exit Page |
| http://onthelearn.bl...weekend-in-city.html |
Out Click |
|
|
Time Zone |
| UTC-4:00 |
Visitor's Time |
| Oct 27 2008 12:45:19 pm |
Visit Number |
| 697 |
THE PENTAGON. FOR REAL? For real. Do they really have nothing better to do? Someone needs to give me a job doing blog searches all damn day long. "Redeployed and Iraq
and mental?" Really?
But let's think about this. Why might the Pentagon be concerned with employing some grunt to conduct such a search? Are they becoming concerned, perhaps, that the public is on to the shameful treatment of Iraq soldiers and veterans? Of Iraqi families and children? Are they worried that the whole "P.F.C. Jane Doe, you had a preexisting condition, silly, you already had borderline personality disorder. So f you and the PTSD horse you rode in on" shtick is getting old? Well, it is. It's getting old and soldiers are committing suicide in record numbers. So maybe the Pentagon should be worried.
Ok, on to the highlights of this evening's Democracy Now broadcast, thus far (yes I am this much of a nerd):
-Tim Robbins detailing his story of not being on the voter roll at a location at which he has voted in the LAST 4 presidential elections, if I understood him correctly, as well as numerous local ones, and then waiting 5 HOURS after refusing to leave the polling place and having his right to stay supported by 2 NYC POLICE OFFICERS and his right to vote guaranteed by a judge; 30 OTHER PEOPLE had the same trouble this morning at Robbins' polling location.
-Bob Fitrakis' discussion of possible shadiness a'brewin in Warren County, Ohio--you can get the low-down
here, though the O-man has already won that state so it's sort of a non-issue I suppose.
-Jeremy Scahill questioning Tim Robbins on his full support for Obama despite Obama's hawkish rhetoric and Robbins' outspoken support for ending the war; the issue of critical support--meaning support coupled with a critical eye--is key in this and any election
-Discussion of voter disenfranchisement and race, including oppressive tactics such as voter roll purging and misinformation regarding identification requirements at polls
So Big Brother is watching me--he must be watching you, too. I guess if he only clocked "0 seconds," I'm deemed not a threat to national security. I don't know whether to feel affronted or relieved. Or amused. But I'm labeling this post recognition, so I suppose I've answered my own question. Then again, I'm also labeling it g.w. is a d.b.